Tag Archive | "sexual racism"

Letters to the Editor – March 24, 2011

Tags: , , , , ,


Dear Editor,

KUDOS for Jessica Osman’s “Papa, Can You Hear Me?”

In her March 17 op-ed, she was so right when she said that for EQUAL RIGHTS we should take the word “marriage” out of the equation and go for words that would grant equality, such as “civil unions.” In the aura of separation of church and state, our fight has been from the religious zealots protecting the sanctity of their hallowed “marriage.” Why should we care what we call it as long as we get the legal rights we constitutionally deserve? I would like for my partner of 17 years to be able to inherit my social security benefits, along with the other thousand or so benefits a legal union provides, and I don’t think there would be so much objection to this if a different term other than “marriage” were used. Let’s get the EQUAL RIGHTS first, which I am sure most people do not object to, then if semantics need be involved that issue could be addressed down the line. My “husband” and myself were legally “married” in Canada, but if the words were “domestic partner” or “civil partner” it certainly wouldn’t matter to us.  C’mon, gay America, let’s get over this hurdle and, as Jessica stated, “find the middle ground.” I’m sure our battle for equality would be greatly streamlined.
Sincerely,
Mike Gaupin
(And Jon Gorcyca)

Dear Editor

Your article on Sexual Racism or Just a Preference really made me think about my own life. Years ago, I had a serious weight problem and still struggle with it on a daily basis.

I thought about all the times I would see someone on the street and they would look at me with disgust. I remember the times I would see someone that I was interested in meeting, smile at them and they would not return the smile or look the other way or online in a chat room when the “what’s your stats” question would come up and would answer honestly and there would be no reply after … it hurt. Sexual Racism or Just a Preference, could it be both?  Then I started to think about have I excluded someone based on this?  Were they too short or tall, did they have a couple of extra pounds or were they too thin, not muscular enough? I realize as I get older … why would I exclude anyone? If you exclude someone you are really excluding yourself from possibly meeting someone really special or possibly missing out experiencing something new because of this person. I now say hello to the person walking down the street. If they extend their hand for a handshake I will extend my hand as well. If I don’t I may never know if I missed out on meeting someone truly spectacular.

Sincerely,
Joe Liquori

Sexual Racism or Just a Preference?

Tags: , ,


ALEX VAUGHN

John Galliano was arrested last Thursday for alleged racist slurs in Paris. The house of Dior suspended him immediately, pending an investigation. Since then a video has emerged showing the belligerent Brit engaging in an aggressive and foul mouthed diatribe. The fashion world was stunned and Dior dresses were removed from the Oscar line-up, bar Nicole Kidman. The fast reaction shows that even in the fickle world of fashion racism is unacceptable full stop. We will not tolerate racial slurs in the bars or in our homes or even from one of the most creative designers of the 21st century. However there is one area it would seem, where racism is acceptable. The internet, most specifically profiles on dating sites.

In an interesting result of the safety of the internet, racism in the community has become more prevalent. In the few lines one has to advertise one’s self for a hook up or a date, many men are turning that space into what is now being viewed as unabashed and clear racism. You can go onto at least 70% of profiles on dating sites and you will see, amongst other ‘preferences’ a clear line describing racial groups that are either preferred or excluded. Surely, this is just a specific of type? Well perhaps, but in all reality it is racist and prejudiced.

By excluding someone solely based on their ethnic background without any knowledge of the person is the definition of racism.

We have all seen; ‘No Asians, No Blacks, No Latinos, White Only. Latino’s only’. Imagine if you read a want ad with those words. There would be an uproar of epic proportions. For sex, it is largely ignored. The effect of this is a divide in the community between ethnic minorities and the creation of stereotypes. We hate to be stereotyped as murse carrying mincing queens. Yet when you see a ‘Gaysian’ in a bar, many assume he must want a white man, older, wealthy and that all comes to the fore of the mind without even having to talk to him. That attitude perpetuates myths and as a result we develop yet another barrier within our community. This pre-judgement is only exasperated by what we see online. The fall out is affecting people outside of cyber world.

The negative of course is that by excluding and pre judging, in a town where relationships are not readily available perhaps you are cutting off your nose to spite your face. ‘I never date Latinos’. Why not? Where did the preconceived notion come from? You weren’t born that way.

Many people suggest that as we learn little lessons from our parents we also develop racial perception. There is a lot of merit in this theory, racial attitudes here in Florida still seem very old fashioned considering the fact the state is a melting pot. Type is not like being gay, it is not inbuilt into our genetic coding, it is developed over time. Challenging those pre conceived notions would benefit you and everyone else. By examining why we think what we do in any situation develops a better understanding of ourselves and society. In this instance a more open view on race would minimise, what I condsider the largely ignored upset caused by the seeming ignorance of gay men. You see it’s obviously easier to just say ‘not my type’ rather than specify the reason as race. It’s more considerate and it allows for a more cohesive community. Now, that said, type is type, we can’t control what turns us on or why we are attracted to one person or the other, however a close examination as to why someone isn’t your type would probably outline other issues that aren’t to do with sex, but social ideals. If your choice is because certain races tend not to have physical attributes, remember it is just that. They ‘tend’ not to. Yet by saying ‘No Blacks’ you rule out an entire race. That is a huge population to dismiss on the basis of skin color or origin.

You may now be thinking that when you go to a site looking for a hook –up, political correctness is not as relevant. It is, perhaps even more so to show that the cyber world is as advanced in attitudes as the real world. That said we all know sites are as much an irritant as they are the modern way to meet people. So specifying type attributes you expect does cut the amount of incompatible responses.

Astoundingly when I asked people who had those lines in their profiles their views on racism. Everyone that said they were against racism, yet didn’t see the fact that writing on their profiles ‘ No GAMs’ is exactly the same principle as hearing an Asian guy was passed up for a role because of his race.

What could we do to change this, in the grander scheme of things? Look into your past, have you ever excluded someone solely on race, ask yourself, why do you think that is? If you can’t get past this and fundamentally see that it is simply a case of ‘type’. Then change your profile, re word it so you have not outlined to a guy reading your profile that you don’t want to even talk to him because of his race. How would you feel if you were or are in a minority ethnic group and you see endless profiles clearly saying because of where you are from you are no one’s type? Check out the suggestions below from a site about Sexual Racism. Remember, an open mind is a preferred preference.

fap turbo reviews
twitter-widget.com